A decade ago, corporate social responsibility in India was a familiar concept wrapped in unfamiliar obligations. The Companies Act 2013 made India the first country in the world to legislate mandatory CSR spending, and the ecosystem that followed — of compliance teams, implementing agencies, monitoring frameworks, and national databases — has grown into one of the largest coordinated social investment systems anywhere.

The number and scale of CSR projects India has funded since 2014 is extraordinary: more than ₹34,900 crore spent in FY 2023–24 alone, touching education, health, environment, skill development, rural development, and dozens of other areas. The question is no longer whether Indian companies spend on CSR. The question is whether they spend wisely.

The answer, too often, is: not as wisely as they could. India’s mandatory CSR regime has produced compliance behaviour — companies meeting the 2% threshold, filing the required reports, selecting projects that are low-risk and visible. That is understandable. But it is not enough.

The communities that CSR spending is meant to serve have complex, interconnected needs that cannot be met by one-off donations, short-term projects, or visible-but-shallow interventions. The most important evolution in Indian CSR is the shift from compliance-orientation to impact-orientation — and companies that make this shift are already seeing the difference.

The Landscape of CSR Projects India

India’s National CSR Portal, maintained by the Ministry of Corporate Affairs, provides a real-time picture of where CSR money goes. Education and health consistently account for the largest share of CSR expenditure.

In FY 2023–24, education received approximately 37% of total CSR funds, making it the single largest category. Healthcare, environmental sustainability, and rural development each received significant allocations. Skill development, women’s empowerment, and poverty alleviation round out the top categories.

The number of companies meeting or exceeding their mandatory spend has reached an all-time high: 69% of reporting companies were fully compliant in FY 2023–24, and 61% exceeded their mandated amount.

Total CSR expenditure has grown from ₹24,834 crore in FY 2014–15 to ₹34,900 crore in FY 2023–24 — a trajectory that reflects both the growth of India’s corporate sector and a genuine increase in commitment.

Schedule VII of the Companies Act 2013 defines the categories within which CSR expenditure must fall. These include: eradication of extreme hunger and poverty; promotion of education; promotion of health; ensuring environmental sustainability; promotion of gender equality and women’s empowerment; protection of national heritage; measures for the benefit of armed forces veterans; promotion of sports; contribution to the Prime Minister’s national relief fund; technology incubation; and rural development projects.

The breadth of Schedule VII gives companies considerable flexibility in choosing areas of focus — and considerable responsibility to choose wisely.

Why Compliance-Only CSR Is Not Enough

The problem with compliance-only CSR is structural. When a company’s primary motivation is to meet the 2% threshold and tick the appropriate boxes, it gravitates toward projects that are easy to approve (no controversy, no complexity), easy to fund (large cheques to well-known organisations), and easy to report (clear outputs: X beneficiaries, Y schools, Z health camps). These projects may not be the ones that produce the greatest social impact.

Compliance-only CSR also tends to be short-term. A company that funds a school’s digital infrastructure for one year and moves on has created hardware that may not be sustained, teachers who were trained once and not supported further, and a community that experienced a brief uplift followed by neglect.

The social return on this kind of investment is low. The reputational value is modest. The BRSR disclosure looks decent on paper but tells investors little about genuine impact.

Strategic CSR is different in design, duration, and depth. It begins with a rigorous needs assessment — understanding the specific, contextual needs of the target community rather than assuming that what works elsewhere will work here. It involves multi-year commitments that allow programmes to produce durable change rather than temporary improvement.

It includes outcome measurement that tracks not just outputs but the changes in people’s lives that outputs are meant to produce. And it is delivered by implementing partners who have both the field presence and the professional capability to translate funding into results.

The Best CSR Projects India Has Produced

The best CSR projects India has produced share certain characteristics. They are born from listening — companies that took the time to understand what communities needed rather than deciding in advance what to give.

They are built for the long term — three, five, or even ten-year programmes that develop as communities develop. They are co-designed with the government — aligning with national schemes and filling gaps rather than duplicating or competing. And they are measured honestly — tracking not just whether money was spent, but whether lives changed.

In education, this means multi-year school transformation programmes that combine infrastructure, teacher training, learning materials, and outcome assessment — not one-year lab installations. In health, it means community health workers trained and supervised over years, not single health camps that treat symptoms but not causes.

In skill development, it means industry-linked vocational training with job placement support, not certificate courses that have no labour market connection. In women’s empowerment, it means sustained engagement with self-help groups, not awareness events that create visibility without capability.

These programmes exist. They are being designed and delivered across India by NGOs with deep field presence, long community relationships, and the professional infrastructure to track and report on impact. The challenge is matching the ambition of corporate CSR teams with the capability of the right implementation partners.

Samabhavana has been that implementation partner for 25 years. Our programmes span education, health, skill development, women empowerment, and diversity and inclusion — and in each area, we bring the field depth, the measurement rigour, and the government alignment that strategic CSR requires.

BRSR and the New Era of Impact Accountability

The introduction of mandatory BRSR (Business Responsibility and Sustainability Reporting) for India’s top 1,000 listed companies has changed the CSR accountability landscape in important ways.

BRSR requires companies to disclose not just their CSR spending, but the processes through which CSR decisions are made, the outcomes achieved, and the relationship between CSR activity and business strategy. This is a fundamental shift from the earlier format, which allowed relatively vague self-reporting.

BRSR’s ESG framework rewards companies that can demonstrate genuine social impact — not just expenditure. Companies with well-documented, outcome-focused CSR projects are in a stronger position to report confidently, attract ESG-conscious investors, and defend their social impact claims to regulators and stakeholders. Companies with compliance-only programmes face growing scrutiny as BRSR expectations increase.

The Ministry of Corporate Affairs amended the Companies (Corporate Social Responsibility Policy) Rules in 2025, tightening conditions for registered implementing agencies and introducing a new web-based CSR-1 registration process. These changes signal a continued regulatory push toward accountability and professionalism in CSR implementation.

Finding the Right Implementation Partner

The choice of implementation partner is one of the most important decisions a CSR committee makes. The right partner brings community relationships built over years, not months. It brings trained field staff who understand the social dynamics of the communities they serve.

It brings programme designs that are realistic about what can be achieved in a given context and timeline. And it brings the monitoring and evaluation infrastructure to tell you, honestly, what is working and what needs to change.

Samabhavana’s PSU and donor partner network reflects 25 years of relationships with companies and PSUs that have experienced the difference between compliance CSR and strategic CSR.

We work with partners who want their CSR investment to matter — to produce change that lasts beyond the project period, contributes to national development goals, and can be reported with pride in any forum.

---

 FAQ

Q1: What are CSR projects India and who must fund them?

CSR projects India are social impact programmes funded by Indian companies under Section 135 of the Companies Act 2013. Any company with a net worth of ₹500 crore or more, or annual turnover of ₹1,000 crore or more, or net profit of ₹5 crore or more must spend at least 2% of its average net profit from the preceding three years on Schedule VII-aligned CSR activities.

Q2: What is Schedule VII and what activities does it include?

Schedule VII of the Companies Act 2013 lists the activities eligible for CSR funding. These include education, healthcare, environmental sustainability, women’s empowerment, poverty eradication, rural development, national heritage protection, sports promotion, armed forces welfare, and contributions to the Prime Minister’s National Relief Fund, among others.

Q3: How much does India spend on CSR annually?

India’s total corporate CSR expenditure crossed ₹34,900 crore in FY 2023–24, up from ₹24,834 crore in FY 2014–15. Education consistently receives the largest share (approximately 37%), followed by healthcare, environment, and rural development.

Q4: What is BRSR and why does it matter for CSR?

BRSR (Business Responsibility and Sustainability Reporting) is mandatory for India’s top 1,000 listed companies, requiring detailed ESG and social impact disclosures. It has significantly raised the accountability bar for CSR, rewarding companies with well-documented, outcome-focused programmes and creating scrutiny for those with compliance-only approaches.

Q5: What is the difference between compliance CSR and strategic CSR?

Compliance CSR focuses on meeting the 2% spend threshold and filing required reports. Strategic CSR starts with community needs assessment, commits to multi-year programmes, measures outcomes rather than just outputs, and aligns with national development priorities. Strategic CSR produces significantly greater social return on investment.

Q6: How do companies choose the right NGO for CSR implementation?

The right NGO partner has deep community relationships, trained field staff, documented impact track records, and the monitoring infrastructure to report honestly on outcomes. Look for organisations with multi-year programme experience in your sector focus. Contact Samabhavana to explore a partnership.

---

 CONCLUSION

CSR projects India at their best are not about compliance — they are about consequence. They are about a child who learns to read because a programme was designed with her needs in mind and sustained long enough to make a difference.

About a woman whose income doubled because a skill training programme was connected to an actual market. About a community whose health improved because a health worker was trained and supported over three years, not three months.

These outcomes are possible. They require commitment, rigour, and the right partners. Samabhavana has been that partner for 25 years, and we are ready to bring that experience to your CSR programme.

Contact Samabhavana to explore how we can make your CSR investment count — not just for your compliance record, but for the communities you serve.